----

William Rotch

Memorandum, Continued...

 

*

part 4 

if they would put my question that they thought would throw

more light on the subject, I would answer it without equivocation

or mental reservation. The Chairman General Ward made me a low

bow, and asked no question, by which they appeared satisfied.

    They then took the Complaint, and examined the witnesses, one

by one upon each charge – "What do you know of this Mr. such a

one?" (reading the Charge) "nothing" -- and so to the next, and

throughout the whole charges, and the whole Witnesses, when

"nothing" was the universal answer, except from Marshall Jenkins

-- He began to tell what the Refugees told him at the Vineyard

when they returned from Nantucket.

    The Chairman stopped him, and said, "were you at Nantucket?"

He answered "no" – "Then you can give no evidence."

    One charge against me was corresponding with the Enemy. This

correspondence was a letter given to Ebenezer Coffin, addressed

to General Prescott, requesting the release of his son, and assuring

him that he had not been in an armed vessel.

    This same Ebenezer acquainted his Brother Alexander that I had

furnished him with this letter, who used his utmost against me.

The Committee were composed of the two Branches, the House

and Senate, who reported to their several Departments. The House

then took the vote and cleared us fully except one single vote. But

the Senate in their vote held us -- The House then desired the

Senate to appoint a Committee of conference, and they would do

the same. They met, and reported, each Branch adhering to their

former vote,

    Thus we were discharged by the House, and held by the Senate,

(but not detained) and so it remained until we were set at liberty

by the Peace.

    In the Complaint I was charged with being the means of pre-

venting a Brig which had much of Jenkins’s property on board from

being re-taken -- I suppose that was the case, by reasoning with the

Owners of the Vessel then present.

    The seven armed vessels had now gone over the Bar, and

anchored, waiting for the flowing of the tide to take the Brig out --

It was then suggested by some hot-headed men, that they could

re-take her -- I admitted it, but asked the Owners if it would be

an even stake, observing "they have now got what they will take at

this time, and if this vessel is stopped, it will bring the whole seven

armed vessels into the harbor again, and no doubt the destruction

of the Town will be the consequence" -- For there was no effective

force to prevent it. "If you (the Owners) will let her go, I am will

ling to contribute to the loss of Vessel and Goods on board, in the

same proportion that I should pay in a Tax of equal amount."

    -- A great number of people were present, who generally united in the

proposal. The Owners let the Vessel go, and I contributed Seven

Hundred and Twenty dollars toward the loss of the property, which

was more than double my proportion of a like Tax.

    When this circumstance was known while we were in Boston,

it raised great indignation against Jenkins, that such a charge should

be in the Complaint, when I had made double compensation to

what I ought.

    In a conversation at the time of our examination with him, sev-

eral others present, I understood him that I ought to make some

concession. My answer was "if turning my hand over by way of

concession, would withdraw the Complaint, I will never do it -- If

my innocence will not protect me, and my life should be taken

my blood will be required at thy hands" -- This shocked him very

much, but it did not last long, as he told some of his friends that

he believed Samuel Starbuck and myself were clear. They then

asked him why he did not take our names out of the Complaint --

He replied "because it suits me best to keep them in."

So callous a heart I hope is not often to be met with, thus play-

ing with our lives as with a Tennis Ball. I am glad to leave this

tragic scene and proceed --

    Some-time in the Year 1780 Admiral Arbuthnot returned to Eng-

land, and Admiral Digby succeeded him. As soon as Arbuthnot

was gone, those plundering Refugees were upon us again. our

protection having ceased by his Departure. This renewed our

perplexity. The Town was convened to consult about measures to

prevent destruction -- The result was to send a Committee again

to New York. to solicit an Order from Admiral Digby similar to that

which we had before. It was proposed for me to go with two

others. I had then been confined nearly nine months with the

Rheumatism, had just left my crutches, and was hobbling about

with a cane -- Therefore I could not think of such an undertaking.

But all others utterly refused to go, unless I would accompany

them.

    This brought a great straight on my mind -- To go I thought

I could not, and to omit it seemed almost inevitable destruction. At

last I consented, under great apprehension that I should not live to

return. We accordingly set sail, and when we were off Rhode

Island, I was obliged to have them go to the East side of the Island,

and lay there several days, for my pain was so great that I could

                                                            Next >>>

 

<<<Back to QUEST Home


QUEST, P.O. Box 82, Bellefonte PA 16823
E-mail: quest@quaker.org


Web: http://quakertheology.org

----